<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Emerging Technology vs Old School</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thednaexchange.com/2010/02/11/emerging-technology-vs-old-school/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thednaexchange.com/2010/02/11/emerging-technology-vs-old-school/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:36:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly Rogel</title>
		<link>http://thednaexchange.com/2010/02/11/emerging-technology-vs-old-school/#comment-386</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kelly Rogel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 22:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thednaexchange.com/?p=820#comment-386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[H,

I really like that idea!  I wonder if this is something NSGC would be interested in doing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>H,</p>
<p>I really like that idea!  I wonder if this is something NSGC would be interested in doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: H</title>
		<link>http://thednaexchange.com/2010/02/11/emerging-technology-vs-old-school/#comment-380</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[H]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thednaexchange.com/?p=820#comment-380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe this is where NSGC &#039;branding&#039; could come into play.  Websites or regular podcasts could apply to have NSGC review their material and give them their &#039;brand&#039; or &#039;seal of approval&#039;.  I&#039;m picturing the same idea as picking foods in grocery stores - where you can choose foods with the &#039;health check&#039; or whatever it is, so that you know you&#039;re getting healthy foods.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe this is where NSGC &#8216;branding&#8217; could come into play.  Websites or regular podcasts could apply to have NSGC review their material and give them their &#8216;brand&#8217; or &#8216;seal of approval&#8217;.  I&#8217;m picturing the same idea as picking foods in grocery stores &#8211; where you can choose foods with the &#8216;health check&#8217; or whatever it is, so that you know you&#8217;re getting healthy foods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jessicagiordano</title>
		<link>http://thednaexchange.com/2010/02/11/emerging-technology-vs-old-school/#comment-374</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jessicagiordano]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 17:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thednaexchange.com/?p=820#comment-374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have the common concern that the internet might displace genetic counselor positions due to the easy access to info and people will forget/not know the value of seeing a GC for the therapeutic process and discussion.

On the other hand, there is a whole population of patients that have little/no access to the internet -- they really need our educational services!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the common concern that the internet might displace genetic counselor positions due to the easy access to info and people will forget/not know the value of seeing a GC for the therapeutic process and discussion.</p>
<p>On the other hand, there is a whole population of patients that have little/no access to the internet &#8212; they really need our educational services!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

